← All guides

Customer support · Taskending editorial team

Interpret resolution-time targets correctly

A resolution target expresses the expectation for completing a request. A first reply does not mean the solution has also been delivered.

Updated: · 1 min read

How to apply it

Read resolution and first-response targets separately in Taskending support reports. Check completion time and actual status history. Do not count cancelled records as successful resolutions, and preserve unknown historical measurements.

A concrete example

A customer may receive a reply in ten minutes while the fix arrives two days later. First response can look good even when resolution misses its target. The measures reveal different problems.

What to watch for

Do not assume advanced pause rules automatically subtract time awaiting a customer. Current basic measurement uses calendar time. Changing a target afterward should not hide the original delay.

How to check the outcome

Select a late-completed example and compare its timestamps. Confirm the same request is not interpreted as both on-time and overdue.

Try it in your own workflow.

Create a company workspace and your first issue. Taskending is currently free.

Start for free

Keep reading

01
Customer support

Are 24/7 SLAs and business-hour targets the same?

The same eight-hour target produces different results under calendar-time and business-hour clocks. Comparing reports without knowing the clock is misleading.

02
Customer support

How to handle a reopened customer request

When a customer still has the problem, the completion record should support renewed investigation. Reopening is not a reason to erase the earlier explanation.

03
Customer support

Hand a support request to engineering

Escalation to engineering should not leave customer communication without an owner. Technical delivery and customer follow-up can have separate responsibilities.

04
Customer support

What to consider when attaching support files

A screenshot or sample file can explain a defect, but unnecessary data makes review harder and broadens the information being shared.